首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of seismic analysis methods applied to a historical church struck by 2009 L’Aquila earthquake
【2h】

Comparison of seismic analysis methods applied to a historical church struck by 2009 L’Aquila earthquake

机译:地震分析方法应用于2009年拉奎拉地震的历史教堂的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper presents the seismic assessment of a historical church by means of different analysis methods. The church of San Marco, seriously damaged by 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy, is chosen as case-study. The analysis tools adopted and compared are linear and non-linear kinematic analysis, FEM pushover analysis and FEM nonlinear dynamic analysis. The different methods are evaluated regarding their ability to predict the damage and collapse mechanisms actually caused by the earthquake. The accelerograms of the main shock of the 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake are considered for nonlinear\uddynamic analysis. The influence of relevant construction features, as original disconnection between parts or RC additions, is analysed into detail. Limit analysis is carried out to understand some of the critical collapse mechanisms which are not clearly revealed by FE analysis. The comparison of the analysis methods indicates advantages and limitations of each approach.
机译:本文介绍了通过不同的分析方法对一座历史教堂的地震评估。案例研究选择了在2009年意大利拉奎拉地震中遭到严重破坏的圣马可教堂。所采用和比较的分析工具为线性和非线性运动学分析,FEM推覆分析和FEM非线性动力学分析。评估了不同方法对地震实际造成的破坏和坍塌机制的预测能力。非线性\动态分析考虑了2009年4月6日拉奎拉地震的主震加速度。详细分析了相关结构特征的影响,例如零件之间的原始断开连接或RC附加件。进行极限分析是为了了解一些有限元崩溃机制,而有限元分析并未清楚揭示这些机制。分析方法的比较表明了每种方法的优点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号